Those who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. Thus, there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people.

Summary

This quote suggests that those who possess control over the military also hold control over the government, enabling them to manipulate the course of political change. It highlights the significant disparity between a leader supported by a standing army and one governed by the apprehension of an armed citizenry. The quote implies that a ruler backed by armed forces would be more likely to pursue self-serving policies, as their power would be unquestioned. In contrast, a leader governing under the watchful eye of an armed population would be more likely to consider the welfare and desires of the people.