Good critical writing is measured by the perception and evaluation of the subject; bad critical writing by the necessity of maintaining the professional standing of the critic.

Summary

This quote suggests that the quality of critical writing can be determined by the ability to perceive and evaluate the subject objectively. Good critical writing focuses on analyzing and critiquing the subject matter, rather than prioritizing the critic's professional reputation. In contrast, bad critical writing is characterized by the critic's desire to protect and elevate their own professional standing, often leading to biased or insincere evaluations. By prioritizing objectivity and genuine analysis over personal reputation, critical writing can provide valuable and insightful perspectives on various subjects.

Topics