Nothing would improve newspaper criticism so much as the knowledge that it was to be read by men too hardy to acquiesce in the authoritative statement of the reviewer.

Summary

This quote suggests that newspaper criticism would greatly benefit from being read by individuals who are resilient and independent enough to not simply accept the reviewer's authoritative statement. In other words, if readers are inclined to question and challenge the opinions presented by critics, it would lead to a more enhanced and improved form of newspaper criticism. This implies that critical thinking, skepticism, and individual judgement are essential for a robust discourse on media interpretation and evaluation.

Topics