The perverse presumption that places the burden of proof on the challenger of spending must be inverted, back to the rule that applies elsewhere in life: 'Prove to me why we should.

Summary

This quote suggests that there is a skewed perception when it comes to spending money. Instead of assuming that the burden of proof lies with those who question or challenge the need for spending, it argues for a shift in perspective. The quote suggests that the burden of proof should be with those who advocate for spending, just as it is in other aspects of life. It advocates for a more critical approach to spending decisions and seeks justification for why resources should be allocated towards particular endeavors.

Topics