The 'pre-emption' versus 'prevention' debate may be a distinction without much difference. The important thing is to have it understood that the United States is absolutely serious. The jihadists have in the past bragged that America is too feeble and corrupt to fight. A lot is involved in disproving that delusion on their part.

Summary

This quote explains that the debate between "pre-emption" (taking action before a threat materializes) and "prevention" (working to avoid the emergence of a threat) may not have a significant difference. What truly matters is ensuring that the United States is perceived as resolute and committed to combatting terrorism. By disproving the notion of American weakness and corruption, the country aims to dismantle the delusion held by jihadists that they cannot be effectively fought against.

Topics