Quote by Edward James Olmos

I believe that Gandhi was correct. Non-violent civil disobedience is the only way to bring about change that allows people to enjoy the change and not get killed in the process.


I believe that Gandhi was correct. Non-violent civil disobed

Summary

This quote highlights the belief that non-violent civil disobedience, as advocated by Gandhi, is the most effective approach to securing meaningful change. It emphasizes the importance of promoting peaceful methods in order to protect human life while still challenging oppressive systems. Instead of resorting to violence, Gandhi believed that non-violent protest and civil disobedience could effectively expose injustices and inspire others to join the cause. This approach aims to ensure that individuals not only achieve the desired transformation but also do so without unnecessary casualties or violence.

Topics

Change
By Edward James Olmos
Liked the quote? Share it with your friends.

Random Quotations

Remaining for a moment with the question of legality and illegality: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1368, unanimously passed, explicitly recognized the right of the United States to self-defense and further called upon all member states 'to bring to justice the perpetrators, organizers and sponsors of the terrorist attacks. It added that 'those responsible for aiding, supporting or harboring the perpetrators, organizers and sponsors of those acts will be held accountable.' In a speech the following month, the United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan publicly acknowledged the right of self-defense as a legitimate basis for military action. The SEAL unit dispatched by President Obama to Abbottabad was large enough to allow for the contingency of bin-Laden's capture and detention. The naïve statement that he was 'unarmed' when shot is only loosely compatible with the fact that he was housed in a military garrison town, had a loaded automatic weapon in the room with him, could well have been wearing a suicide vest, had stated repeatedly that he would never be taken alive, was the commander of one of the most violent organizations in history, and had declared himself at war with the United States. It perhaps says something that not even the most casuistic apologist for al-Qaeda has ever even attempted to justify any of its 'operations' in terms that could be covered by any known law, with the possible exception of some sanguinary verses of the Koran.

Christopher Hitchens