Quote by Stokely Carmichael

We had no more courage than Harriet Tubman or Marcus Garvey had in their times. We just had a more vulnerable enemy.


We had no more courage than Harriet Tubman or Marcus Garvey

Summary

This quote suggests that the speaker, presumably referring to a group of individuals, believes they possess no more courage than historical figures like Harriet Tubman or Marcus Garvey. However, they claim that their courage was demonstrated in facing a different kind of enemy - one that was more vulnerable compared to the ones Tubman and Garvey confronted in their respective eras. In essence, this quote implies that the individuals being referred to faced challenges and exhibited bravery, acknowledging historical figures' struggles but highlighting the unique nature of their own battle.

Topics

Courage
By Stokely Carmichael
Liked the quote? Share it with your friends.

Random Quotations

It comes as no surprise to find [Norman] Mailer embracing [in the book ] a form of Manicheanism, pitting the forces of light and darkness against each other in a permanent stand-off, with humanity as the battlefield. (When asked if Jesus is part of this battle, he responds rather loftily that he thinks it is a distinct possibility.) But it is at points like this that he talks as if all the late-night undergraduate talk sessions on the question of theism had become rolled into one. 'How can we not face up to the fact that if God is All-Powerful, He cannot be All-Good. Or She cannot be All-Good.'Mailer says that questions such as this have bedevilled 'theologians', whereas it would be more accurate to say that such questions, posed by philosophers, have attempted to put theologians out of business. A long exchange on the probability of reincarnation (known to Mailer sometimes as karmic reassignment) manages to fall slightly below the level of those undergraduate talk sessions. The Manichean stand-off leads Mailer, in closing, to speculate on what God might desire politically and to say: 'In different times, the heavens may have been partial to monarchy, to communism, and certainly the Lord was interested in democracy, in capitalism. (As was the Devil!)'I think it was at this point that I decided I would rather remember Mailer as the author of and .

Christopher Hitchens