Quote by Ayn Rand, The Journals of Ayn Ra

This is the difference between my morality and hedonism. The standard is not: that is good which gives me pleasure, just because it gives me pleasure (which is the standard of the dipsomaniac or the sex-chaser)http://usabig.com/autonomist/articles11/egoist.html


This is the difference between my morality and hedonism. The

Summary

This quote highlights the distinction between the speaker's personal morality and hedonism. The speaker asserts that their moral compass does not rely solely on seeking pleasure for themselves, as hedonism does. They criticize the mindset of indulging in excessive drinking or pursuing purely sensual pleasure without any consideration for consequences or ethical principles. The quote suggests that the speaker's morality is guided by a different standard, one that assesses the goodness of actions based on more than just personal pleasure.

Topics

Morals
By Ayn Rand, The Journals of Ayn Ra
Liked the quote? Share it with your friends.

Random Quotations

I believe in political equality. But there are two opposite reasons for being a democrat. You may think all men so good that they deserve a share in the government of the commonwealth, and so wise that the commonwealth needs their advice. That is, in my opinion, the false, romantic doctrine of democracy. On the other hand, you may believe fallen men to be so wicked that not one of them can be trusted with any irresponsible power over his fellows. That I believe to be the true ground of democracy. I do not believe that God created an egalitarian world. I believe the authority of parent over child, husband over wife, learned over simple to have been as much a part of the original plan as the authority of man over beast. I believe that if we had not fallen, patriarchal monarchy would be the sole lawful government. But since we have learned sin, we have found, as Lord Acton says, that all power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The only remedy has been to take away the powers and substitute a legal fiction of equality. The authority of father and husband has been rightly abolished on the legal plane, not because this authority is in itself bad (on the contrary, it is, I hold, divine in origin), but because fathers and husbands are bad. Theocracy has been rightly abolished not because it is bad that learned priests should govern ignorant laymen, but because priests are wicked men like the rest of us. Even the authority of man over beast has had to be interfered with because it is constantly abused.

C.S. Lewis