Quote by Anatole France

No government ought to be without censors and where the press is free, no one ever will. Chance is the pseudonym of God when he did not want to sign.


No government ought to be without censors and where the pres

Summary

This quote highlights the necessity of having checks and balances in a government. It emphasizes the role of censorship in ensuring a free press and the importance of transparency. By suggesting that chance is a pseudonym used by God to remain anonymous, the quote alludes to the idea that individuals in positions of power may deliberately try to conceal their actions or intentions. Ultimately, the quote suggests that a government without any form of censorship and a free press is unlikely to exist, as it would allow for a lack of accountability.

Topics

God
By Anatole France
Liked the quote? Share it with your friends.

Random Quotations

It comes as no surprise to find [Norman] Mailer embracing [in the book ] a form of Manicheanism, pitting the forces of light and darkness against each other in a permanent stand-off, with humanity as the battlefield. (When asked if Jesus is part of this battle, he responds rather loftily that he thinks it is a distinct possibility.) But it is at points like this that he talks as if all the late-night undergraduate talk sessions on the question of theism had become rolled into one. 'How can we not face up to the fact that if God is All-Powerful, He cannot be All-Good. Or She cannot be All-Good.'Mailer says that questions such as this have bedevilled 'theologians', whereas it would be more accurate to say that such questions, posed by philosophers, have attempted to put theologians out of business. A long exchange on the probability of reincarnation (known to Mailer sometimes as karmic reassignment) manages to fall slightly below the level of those undergraduate talk sessions. The Manichean stand-off leads Mailer, in closing, to speculate on what God might desire politically and to say: 'In different times, the heavens may have been partial to monarchy, to communism, and certainly the Lord was interested in democracy, in capitalism. (As was the Devil!)'I think it was at this point that I decided I would rather remember Mailer as the author of and .

Christopher Hitchens