When you look at other countries that are developing the capabilities and the technology to deploy missiles of very significant destructive capability with nuclear, chemical, or biological warheads, then the MAD dogma makes even less sense.

Summary

This quote suggests that the concept of mutually assured destruction (MAD) becomes less meaningful when considering countries that are acquiring advanced missile technology capable of carrying powerful nuclear, chemical, or biological warheads. MAD is a theoretical deterrent strategy where the threat of massive retaliation ensures both sides avoid launching a full-scale attack, as it would result in mutual annihilation. However, the quote argues that as more nations develop destructive capabilities, relying solely on MAD becomes inadequate as it may not prevent the use of these devastating weapons.

Topics