Quote by Source Unknown

Not what you have, but what you see; Not what you see, but what you choose; Not what seems fair, but what is true; Not what you dream, but what you do; Not what you take, but what you give; Not as you pray, but as you live. These are the things that mar or bless The sum of human happiness.


Not what you have, but what you see; Not what you see, but w

Summary

This quote emphasizes the importance of perception and choices in shaping our lives and the happiness we experience. It implies that it is not only about the material possessions one has, but more about how one sees the world and the choices they make. It encourages individuals to value truth over what may seem fair, and promoting positive action over mere dreams. Furthermore, it highlights the significance of giving rather than taking, and the integration of prayer with practical living. Ultimately, it suggests that our actions and attitudes are the ultimate factors that determine the overall level of human happiness.

By Source Unknown
Liked the quote? Share it with your friends.

Random Quotations

It comes as no surprise to find [Norman] Mailer embracing [in the book ] a form of Manicheanism, pitting the forces of light and darkness against each other in a permanent stand-off, with humanity as the battlefield. (When asked if Jesus is part of this battle, he responds rather loftily that he thinks it is a distinct possibility.) But it is at points like this that he talks as if all the late-night undergraduate talk sessions on the question of theism had become rolled into one. 'How can we not face up to the fact that if God is All-Powerful, He cannot be All-Good. Or She cannot be All-Good.'Mailer says that questions such as this have bedevilled 'theologians', whereas it would be more accurate to say that such questions, posed by philosophers, have attempted to put theologians out of business. A long exchange on the probability of reincarnation (known to Mailer sometimes as karmic reassignment) manages to fall slightly below the level of those undergraduate talk sessions. The Manichean stand-off leads Mailer, in closing, to speculate on what God might desire politically and to say: 'In different times, the heavens may have been partial to monarchy, to communism, and certainly the Lord was interested in democracy, in capitalism. (As was the Devil!)'I think it was at this point that I decided I would rather remember Mailer as the author of and .

Christopher Hitchens