Quote by J. Robert Oppenheimer

We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita; Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty, and to impress him, takes on his multi-armed form and says, 'Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.' I suppose we all thought that, one way or another.

We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughe

Summary

This quote reflects the feelings of those involved in the development and deployment of the atomic bomb. It highlights the profound impact and significance of this new powerful weapon. While some individuals reacted with laughter or tears, the majority remained silent, displaying a deeply contemplative response. The quote also alludes to a passage in the Hindu scripture Bhagavad-Gita, where Vishnu reveals himself as the embodiment of destruction. This implies that those involved in the creation of the bomb felt a similar sense of responsibility and recognition of the immense destructive capability they had unleashed upon the world.

Topics

Science Wwii Manhatttan Project Nuclear Bomb

By J. Robert Oppenheimer

Liked the quote? Share it with your friends.

Random Quotations

Mere words are cheap and plenty enough, but ideas that rouse

Mere words are cheap and plenty enough, but ideas that rouse and set multitudes thinking come as gold for the mines.

Without renouncing the support of physics, it is possible fo

Without renouncing the support of physics, it is possible for the physiology of the senses, not only to pursue its own course of development, but also to afford to physical science itself powerful assistance.

But this momentous question, like a fire bell in the night,

But this momentous question, like a fire bell in the night, awakened and filled me with terror.

Thomas Jefferson

Your surroundings may change but your essence and your perso

Your surroundings may change but your essence and your personality pretty much stay the same.

We don't get to know people when they come to us; we must go

We don't get to know people when they come to us; we must go to them to find out what they are like.

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

People Relationships

She was looking into my eyes with that way she had of lookin

She was looking into my eyes with that way she had of looking that made you wonder whether she really saw out of her own eyes. They would look on and on after every one else's eyes in the world would have stopped looking. She looked as though there were nothing on earth she would not look at like that, and really she was afraid of so many things.

Ernest Hemingway

Beauty Inspirational Eyes Personality Looking

Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a blame to any peo

Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a blame to any people.

When a man does exactly what a woman expects him to do she d

When a man does exactly what a woman expects him to do she doesn't think much of him. One should always do what a woman doesn't expect, just as one should say what she doesn't understand.

From a certain point onward there is no longer any turning b

From a certain point onward there is no longer any turning back. That is the point that must be reached.

All brave men love for he only is brave who has affections t

All brave men love for he only is brave who has affections to fight for, whether in the daily battle of life, or in physical contests.

Nathaniel Hawthorne

Prayer does not change God, but changes him who prays.

Prayer does not change God, but changes him who prays.

Soren Kierkegaard

But there is another way of using the equivalence, which is

But there is another way of using the equivalence, which is almost the opposite of allegory, and which I would call sacramentalism or symbolism. If our passions, being immaterial, can be copied by material inventions, then it is possible that our material world in its turn is the copy of an invisible world. As the god Amor and his figurative garden are to the actual passions of men, so perhaps we ourselves and our 'real' world are to something else. The attempt to read that something else through its sensible imitations, to see the archetype in the copy, is what I mean by symbolism or sacramentalism. It is, in fine, 'the philosophy of Hermes that this visible world is but a picture of the invisible, wherein, as a portrait, things are not truly but in equivocal shapes, as they counterfeit some real substance in that visible fabrick'. The difference between the two can hardly be exaggerated. The allegorist leaves the given -- his own passions -- to talk of that which is confessedly less real, which is a fiction. The symbolist leaves the given to find that which is more real. To put the difference in another way, for the symbolist it is we who are the allegory. We are the 'frigid personifications'; the heavens above us are the 'shadowy abstractions'; the world which we mistake for reality is the flat outline of that which elsewhere veritably is in all the round of its unimaginable dimensions.

Reality Perception