The problem for those who assert biblical authority in support of traditional definitions of marriage is that one could, with equal validity, assert that the lending of money or certain kinds of haircuts are forbidden by God, or that slavery and the subjugation of women are authorized by the Lord.

Summary

This quote highlights the dilemma faced by those who use biblical authority to justify conventional interpretations of marriage. It argues that if one can selectively interpret scripture to support traditional marriage, then it is equally possible to find biblical passages that condemn certain financial practices, hairstyles, endorse slavery, or justify the subjugation of women. Consequently, the quote emphasizes the subjective nature of interpreting religious texts and raises questions about the consistency and validity of using biblical authority to shape societal norms or beliefs.

Topics