Quote by John Irving

You can't learn everything you need to know legally.

You can't learn everything you need to know legally.

Summary

This quote suggests that some knowledge or experiences cannot be acquired through legal means alone. It implies that there are certain aspects of life that can only be understood or obtained through illegal actions, or outside the boundaries of what is morally or legally acceptable. It highlights the limitations of legality in providing a comprehensive understanding or education on certain matters, emphasizing the existence of a realm of knowledge that lies beyond the confines of what is permitted by law.

Topics

Liked the quote? Share it with your friends.

Random Quotations

Even as a kid I was never the generator of humor, but I alwa

Even as a kid I was never the generator of humor, but I always knew who was funny, who to hang out with.

There are better alternatives... Australia should be exporti

There are better alternatives... Australia should be exporting its solar technology, not its uranium.

It's amazing that you can listen to any song and you can alw

It's amazing that you can listen to any song and you can always tell when there's some substance beneath it and when there isn't. Even if it's poetically written and technically brilliant, I'd rather hear something that's all over the place but has some soul to it.

Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lo

Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart; and you shall find rest for your souls.

Offered a job as book critic for magazine as a young man, Be

Offered a job as book critic for magazine as a young man, Bellow had been interviewed by Chambers and asked to give his opinion about William Wordsworth. Replying perhaps too quickly that Wordsworth had been a Romantic poet, he had been brusquely informed by Chambers that there was no place for him at the magazine. Bellow had often wondered, he told us, what he ought to have said. I suggested that he might have got the job if he'd replied that Wordsworth was a once-revolutionary poet who later became a conservative and was denounced by Browning and others as a turncoat. This seemed to Bellow to be probably right. More interesting was the related question: What if he'd that job?

Christopher Hitchens

Literary Criticism Robert Browning Romantic Poetry Saul Bellow Time Magazine Whittaker Chambers Wordsworth

The duty of criticism is neither to depreciate nor dignify b

The duty of criticism is neither to depreciate nor dignify by partial representations, but to hold out the light of reason, whatever it may discover; and to promulgate the determinations of truth, whatever she shall dictate

What is now proved was only once imagined.

What is now proved was only once imagined.

The artist must bow to the monster of his own imagination.

The artist must bow to the monster of his own imagination.

Now for my own case, I bless the Lord that, for all that hat

Now for my own case, I bless the Lord that, for all that hath been said of me, my conscience doth not condemn me. I do not say I am free of sin, but I am at peace with God through a slain Mediator and I believe that there is no salvation but only in Christ.

I just want to be loved, is that so wrong?!

I just want to be loved, is that so wrong?!

Harvey Fierstein

Love Acceptance

The sinews of art and literature, like those of war, are mon

The sinews of art and literature, like those of war, are money.

The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was b

The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money.Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socioeconomic unfairness.

Terry Pratchett

Economics Boots