A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means.

Summary

This quote recognizes the importance of following written laws as a responsibility of a good citizen. However, it also highlights that there are circumstances where obeying the letter of the law may not be the highest duty. In cases of necessity, self-preservation, or defending one's country, adherence to written law may need to be surpassed. The quote points out that an excessive commitment to following the law could result in the loss of the very values and freedoms the law is intended to protect. Ultimately, it emphasizes the need for balance between upholding the law and protecting fundamental rights and principles.