The ambivalence of writing is such that it can be considered both an act and an interpretive process that follows after an act with which it cannot coincide. As such, it both affirms and denies its own nature.

Summary

This quote highlights the complex nature of writing. It suggests that writing can be seen as both an action in itself and a process of interpreting or reflecting upon an action. However, it asserts that writing cannot perfectly coincide with the original act it is referring to, thereby creating an ambivalence. It implies that writing simultaneously affirms and denies its own essence, highlighting the intricate relationship between the act of writing and its interpretive nature.

Topics