What puzzles me most is your criticism that he showed 'no sense of engagement'. I haven't met the expression before, and feel bound to comment on its totalitarian tang. Engagement not with the truth as the speaker apprehends it, but with the alleged opinion of the majority of listeners.

Summary

This quote criticizes the notion of "no sense of engagement" and questions its interpretation. The speaker finds this phrase problematic because it implies a lack of connection not with the truth, but with the supposed majority opinion. The quote implies that instead of engaging with objective truths, one might be expected to conform to the opinion of the majority. It highlights a concern about prioritizing popular opinion over genuine engagement with truth and ideas.

Topics